Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

There's somehow a feeling that GDPR changes what should be done about Personal and Personally Identifying Data that we need not do now. But that isn't really true, For instance, EU citizens have had the right to be forgotten since 2014 after the ECJ decision relating to a Spanish case in 2010. What is happening is that the standards of a complaint, audit and penalty have changed and of course its the penalty which is the real motivator to improve systems. Removing an individual's data from a live system can be painful but is not usually that hard, removing it from archived data looks like it will be expensive. Apart from other regulatory reasons for keeping data does it mean we have to read and rewrite all archives every time someone asks for their data to be removed? Are we forced to make archived data live to keep it updated? 

The key points about the GDPR is auditable governance of data and availability of data for those it belongs to. If archived data is not accessible, is not online is not available 

  • No labels